<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Really Mobile Project - Latest Comments in Nokia&amp;#039;s N97 &amp;amp; 5800XM: The trouble with 16:9</title><link>http://trmp.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://trmp.disqus.com/nokia8217s_n97_amp_the_5800_the_trouble_with_169/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 22:17:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Nokia&amp;#039;s N97 &amp;amp; 5800XM: The trouble with 16:9</title><link>http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/05/nokias-n97-the-5800-the-trouble-with-169/#comment-67586519</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How about recording it on VGA mode on the 5800/N97 to zoom out a little bit, and then publish it as widescreen when editing the video later like on iMovie?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Guim</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 22:17:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia&amp;#039;s N97 &amp;amp; 5800XM: The trouble with 16:9</title><link>http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/05/nokias-n97-the-5800-the-trouble-with-169/#comment-67586518</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That saving "tech/effort/cost" on such things wouldn't have an impact on the "angle" of the picture, besides of course using a different lens.&lt;br&gt;What matters here is the width of the lens, and on the N97, it is wider than on the 5800. You can have the device closer to you when taking self videos for example.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I took a picture couple days back but I lost it.&lt;br&gt;I'll take an other one tomorrow.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julien</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 18:26:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia&amp;#039;s N97 &amp;amp; 5800XM: The trouble with 16:9</title><link>http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/05/nokias-n97-the-5800-the-trouble-with-169/#comment-67586516</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure what you mean?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Whatley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 16:46:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia&amp;#039;s N97 &amp;amp; 5800XM: The trouble with 16:9</title><link>http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/05/nokias-n97-the-5800-the-trouble-with-169/#comment-67586515</link><description>&lt;p&gt;James, can you tell me how we could do that?&lt;br&gt;Cause honestly, I don't see where it would be possible and provide such a "side effect".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julien</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 16:35:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia&amp;#039;s N97 &amp;amp; 5800XM: The trouble with 16:9</title><link>http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/05/nokias-n97-the-5800-the-trouble-with-169/#comment-9334091</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How about recording it on VGA mode on the 5800/N97 to zoom out a little bit, and then publish it as widescreen when editing the video later like on iMovie?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Guim</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 16:17:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia&amp;#039;s N97 &amp;amp; 5800XM: The trouble with 16:9</title><link>http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/05/nokias-n97-the-5800-the-trouble-with-169/#comment-9327969</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That saving "tech/effort/cost" on such things wouldn't have an impact on the "angle" of the picture, besides of course using a different lens.&lt;br&gt;What matters here is the width of the lens, and on the N97, it is wider than on the 5800. You can have the device closer to you when taking self videos for example.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I took a picture couple days back but I lost it.&lt;br&gt;I'll take an other one tomorrow.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julien</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 12:26:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia&amp;#039;s N97 &amp;amp; 5800XM: The trouble with 16:9</title><link>http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/05/nokias-n97-the-5800-the-trouble-with-169/#comment-9326095</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure what you mean? &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Whatley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 10:46:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia&amp;#039;s N97 &amp;amp; 5800XM: The trouble with 16:9</title><link>http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/05/nokias-n97-the-5800-the-trouble-with-169/#comment-9325878</link><description>&lt;p&gt;James, can you tell me how we could do that?&lt;br&gt;Cause honestly, I don't see where it would be possible and provide such a "side effect".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julien</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 10:35:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia&amp;#039;s N97 &amp;amp; 5800XM: The trouble with 16:9</title><link>http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/05/nokias-n97-the-5800-the-trouble-with-169/#comment-67586514</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mr Facts on Demand.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually this might make a good point of comparison in a phone face-off: Nokia great lens and pixel count but impossible angles. iPhone bad a everything optical and now proven by Smithian science.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">juliancooling</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:30:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia&amp;#039;s N97 &amp;amp; 5800XM: The trouble with 16:9</title><link>http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/05/nokias-n97-the-5800-the-trouble-with-169/#comment-9245887</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mr Facts on Demand.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Actually this might make a good point of comparison in a phone face-off: Nokia great lens and pixel count but impossible angles. iPhone bad a everything optical and now proven by Smithian science.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">juliancooling</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 11:30:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia&amp;#039;s N97 &amp;amp; 5800XM: The trouble with 16:9</title><link>http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/05/nokias-n97-the-5800-the-trouble-with-169/#comment-67586513</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ordinarily, I would have agreed, and gone down the same route.  However, I just fancy something a bit different to the norm for a change.  I figured that if I hate the N97 when it comes, I'll be able to eBay it at a fair rate, and buy an unbranded N86 instead. :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SteveRowlands</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 18:40:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia&amp;#039;s N97 &amp;amp; 5800XM: The trouble with 16:9</title><link>http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/05/nokias-n97-the-5800-the-trouble-with-169/#comment-67586512</link><description>&lt;p&gt;See I'm more of a photo fan too - which is why I'm waiting for the N86. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Whatley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 18:30:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia&amp;#039;s N97 &amp;amp; 5800XM: The trouble with 16:9</title><link>http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/05/nokias-n97-the-5800-the-trouble-with-169/#comment-67586511</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Doubtful. Can't see the logic myself. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;More likely stripped down 'normal' recording to save tech/effort/cost.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Whatley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:58:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia&amp;#039;s N97 &amp;amp; 5800XM: The trouble with 16:9</title><link>http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/05/nokias-n97-the-5800-the-trouble-with-169/#comment-67586510</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Whatever it's called, it's crap on the 5800 and it looks like the N97 is no better either!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:P&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Whatley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:53:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia&amp;#039;s N97 &amp;amp; 5800XM: The trouble with 16:9</title><link>http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/05/nokias-n97-the-5800-the-trouble-with-169/#comment-67586507</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's why I said "for a fixed sensor size". The correct term is indeed "field of view", but focal lenght is more commonly used as a measure of the view angle of a lens. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But yeah, what Ben said :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nico</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:29:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia&amp;#039;s N97 &amp;amp; 5800XM: The trouble with 16:9</title><link>http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/05/nokias-n97-the-5800-the-trouble-with-169/#comment-67586506</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dan Lane: Yellow card.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Smith</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:24:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia&amp;#039;s N97 &amp;amp; 5800XM: The trouble with 16:9</title><link>http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/05/nokias-n97-the-5800-the-trouble-with-169/#comment-67586498</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As irritating as this is - and obviously I witnessed it first hand - could this be a design decision. Nokia decided most people filmed stuff 'far away' and preferred the 'zoomed' effect?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Smith</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:20:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia&amp;#039;s N97 &amp;amp; 5800XM: The trouble with 16:9</title><link>http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/05/nokias-n97-the-5800-the-trouble-with-169/#comment-67586497</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you're both right (ish) - for a certain sensor size 'field of view' is directly proportional to 'focal length', although what James is complaining about is actually the 'field of view'.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The impact on the 'field of view' of the sensor size is called the 'field of view crop factor' or 'focal length multiplier'.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Smith</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:19:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia&amp;#039;s N97 &amp;amp; 5800XM: The trouble with 16:9</title><link>http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/05/nokias-n97-the-5800-the-trouble-with-169/#comment-67586495</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Breaking news: Steve Litchfield in being wrong shocker!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DanLane</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:16:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia&amp;#039;s N97 &amp;amp; 5800XM: The trouble with 16:9</title><link>http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/05/nokias-n97-the-5800-the-trouble-with-169/#comment-67586494</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No, it doesn't, although admittedly I was wrong too 8-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Focal length is the intra-camera distance from the centre of the lens to the centre of the sensor etc.. Not sure what the distance I was talking about is called: maybe 'focal point'?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway, the thing James was talking about is, apparently, termed 'field of view'. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So now we all know!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stevelitchfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:05:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia&amp;#039;s N97 &amp;amp; 5800XM: The trouble with 16:9</title><link>http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/05/nokias-n97-the-5800-the-trouble-with-169/#comment-67586492</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting article (and discussion). I tend to carry a large wide-angle lens with me for my HD camcorder. It's quite surprising how much nicer the final results are, especially for large vistas, indoor scenes and group photos or videos.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I used to own a SD Canon camcorder that 'suffered' from an extremely tight angle, it was horrible to use, most indoor video was useless.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for Nokia devices... The best lens combo that I've ever witnessed was the N93i. But then that isn't too surprising as it was the last to feature optical zoom.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd better stop now as I'm starting to get depressed just thinking about the stagnation of video capture in the mobile industry. Help me Omnia HD, you're my only hope! ... Just make sure you fix the frame rate Samsung or they'll be hell to pay!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">&amp;quot;The Masses&amp;quot; a.k.a M</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:03:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia&amp;#039;s N97 &amp;amp; 5800XM: The trouble with 16:9</title><link>http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/05/nokias-n97-the-5800-the-trouble-with-169/#comment-67586490</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Uh... actually, no. Focal lenght is the right term. It means exactly "how wide the angle of the lens is" (at least for a fixed sensor size). Here's something from good ole' &lt;a href="http://photo.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="photo.net"&gt;photo.net&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://photo.net/learn/fov/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://photo.net/learn/fov/"&gt;http://photo.net/learn/fov/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nico</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:47:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia&amp;#039;s N97 &amp;amp; 5800XM: The trouble with 16:9</title><link>http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/05/nokias-n97-the-5800-the-trouble-with-169/#comment-67586489</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is quite a concern of mine, but I don't think it will put me off buying an N97.  However, James is right to bring this subject to light, as I'm sure it will irritate the shiv out of some people.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For me, I can put up with this irritation because I shoot photo's rather than video's.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SteveRowlands</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:39:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia&amp;#039;s N97 &amp;amp; 5800XM: The trouble with 16:9</title><link>http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/05/nokias-n97-the-5800-the-trouble-with-169/#comment-9208371</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ordinarily, I would have agreed, and gone down the same route.  However, I just fancy something a bit different to the norm for a change.  I figured that if I hate the N97 when it comes, I'll be able to eBay it at a fair rate, and buy an unbranded N86 instead. :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SteveRowlands</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 12:40:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia&amp;#039;s N97 &amp;amp; 5800XM: The trouble with 16:9</title><link>http://thereallymobileproject.com/2009/05/nokias-n97-the-5800-the-trouble-with-169/#comment-9208124</link><description>&lt;p&gt;See I'm more of a photo fan too - which is why I'm waiting for the N86.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;:) &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Whatley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 12:30:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>